Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix strict mode docs #4150

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bentsherman
Copy link
Member

Close #4148

When I documented strict mode, I said that certain options are true "by default", when in fact they are true regardless of any user setting.

Signed-off-by: Ben Sherman <bentshermann@gmail.com>
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 3, 2023

Deploy Preview for nextflow-docs-staging ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e823dd7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/nextflow-docs-staging/deploys/64cbc067ec66ea00088cac6f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4150--nextflow-docs-staging.netlify.app/config
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@pditommaso pditommaso merged commit 6b46b50 into master Aug 3, 2023
19 checks passed
@pditommaso pditommaso deleted the 4148-docs-strict-mode-join-operator branch August 3, 2023 15:02
pditommaso pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
Signed-off-by: Ben Sherman <bentshermann@gmail.com>
abhi18av pushed a commit to abhi18av/nextflow that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2023
Signed-off-by: Ben Sherman <bentshermann@gmail.com>
@jchorl
Copy link
Contributor

jchorl commented Feb 24, 2024

Does this mean that it is impossible to override failOnMismatch in strict mode?

As a user, that is surprising to me. I would expect strict-mode to enforce better defaults and validate configuration more strictly, but I would not expect it to silently ignore certain settings.

@bentsherman
Copy link
Member Author

I agree it is strange 🤷‍♂️ Maybe it was not intentional

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

failOnMismatch without remainder cannot be set to false in strict mode
3 participants